Skip to content
Go back

Chain of Thought Prompting 101

Chain of Thought Prompting 101

I asked Claude to solve a math problem once and got the wrong answer. Then I asked it to “think step by step” and it got the right answer immediately.

That’s Chain of Thought prompting in a nutshell. You make the AI show its work just like your math teacher used to make you do. It’s a simple trick that dramatically improves accuracy for logic problems, math calculations, and anything requiring multi-step thinking. Honestly feels like cheating.

Table of contents

Open Table of contents

What is Chain of Thought Prompting?

Remember when your math teacher made you “show your work” on every problem? Chain of Thought prompting is the same concept applied to AI. Instead of jumping straight to an answer, the AI explains its reasoning at each step along the way, which helps it catch mistakes and arrive at better answers.

Here’s a concrete example to show you what I mean: “Roger has 5 tennis balls. He buys 2 cans of tennis balls, with each can containing 3 balls. How many tennis balls does Roger have total?”

Without Chain of Thought: The AI just responds with “11 tennis balls” and you have no idea how it got there.

With Chain of Thought: The AI shows its work: “Roger starts with 5 tennis balls. He buys 2 cans with 3 balls each, so that’s 2 × 3 = 6 new balls. Adding them together: 5 + 6 = 11 tennis balls total.”

The second response shows you exactly why the answer is correct. You can verify each step, spot any errors in the logic, and actually understand the reasoning process.

It’s called a “chain” because the reasoning flows in a sequence: Question → Step 1 → Step 2 → Step 3 → Final Answer. If you break one link in the chain, the whole thing breaks. But if you fix one link, the rest of the reasoning often improves too.

Why Chain of Thought Works

It mimics how humans think: When you calculate a tip on a $50 bill, you don’t instantly know the answer - you think “20% of $50 equals $10” in your head first. Chain of Thought prompting forces the AI to work through problems the same way humans do, step by step.

It reduces errors dramatically: Jumping straight to conclusions leads to mistakes because the AI might skip crucial reasoning steps. When you make it show its work, the AI catches and fixes errors mid-response before committing to a wrong answer.

It activates relevant knowledge: Step-by-step reasoning helps the model access more relevant information from its training data. When you ask “Where is the Eiffel Tower?” the model might think “France” → “Paris is the capital of France” → “The Eiffel Tower is in Paris” and arrive at a confident, detailed answer.

It handles complexity naturally: Multi-step problems like calculating a price with both a discount and tax require sequential reasoning that’s hard to do in one mental leap. Chain of Thought lets the AI break complex problems into manageable chunks that it can solve one at a time.

Types of Chain of Thought Prompting

Zero-Shot Chain of Thought: Just add the phrase “Let’s think step by step” at the end of your prompt. Five words, massive accuracy improvement. It sounds too simple to work, but it works anyway. This is what most people mean when they talk about Chain of Thought prompting.

Few-Shot Chain of Thought: Provide examples of problems solved with step-by-step reasoning before asking your actual question. The model learns the pattern from your examples and applies the same reasoning style to the new question you’re asking.

Manual Chain of Thought: Explicitly structure the reasoning format you want the AI to follow. Something like “Step 1: Identify the formula. Step 2: Identify the values. Step 3: Calculate the result. Step 4: Verify your answer.” This gives you the most control over the reasoning process.

Tree of Thoughts: Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously and then synthesize them. For example, Branch 1 might analyze market conditions, Branch 2 evaluates readiness, and Branch 3 reviews financials. You combine insights from all branches to make a better final decision.

When to Use Chain of Thought

Use Chain of Thought for these scenarios: Math problems where you need to show calculations, logic puzzles that require deduction, multi-step instructions that need to be followed in sequence, complex reasoning tasks that involve multiple considerations, data analysis where you need to explain patterns, and code debugging where you need to trace through execution step by step.

Don’t waste tokens on Chain of Thought for: Simple factual lookups like “What is the capital of France?” where the answer is straightforward, definition requests where no reasoning is needed, basic information retrieval, or creative writing tasks where step-by-step reasoning actually constrains creativity rather than helping it.

Implementing Chain of Thought

Use simple trigger phrases: The easiest way to activate Chain of Thought is adding phrases like “Let’s think step by step” or “Let’s work through this carefully” or “Let’s break this down” at the end of your prompt. These magic phrases are surprisingly effective.

Provide explicit structure when you need control: Tell the AI exactly how to format its reasoning: “Show your work in numbered steps: Step 1, Step 2, Step 3, and then provide the Final Answer.” This works great when you need consistent formatting across multiple requests.

Ask guiding questions: Frame your prompt as a series of questions: “What information do we have? What are we trying to find? What steps do we need to take?” This helps the AI organize its thinking process from the start.

Build in verification steps: Ask the AI to verify its own work: “Solve this step by step, then verify your answer by working backwards, check if the result makes sense in context, and state your confidence level.” Self-checking dramatically reduces errors.

Use a complete template for complex problems: Structure your prompt as Analysis (what’s known, what’s unknown, what are the constraints) → Solution (work through the steps) → Verification (check your work) → Conclusion (final answer with confidence). This template works for almost any reasoning task.

Key Takeaways

Common mistakes to avoid: Don’t use Chain of Thought for trivially simple tasks like 2+2 where showing work adds no value. Be specific about what reasoning you want, not vague with “think about this.” Always include verification steps to catch errors. Don’t let your chain of logic break or skip steps in the middle. State clear, explicit conclusions at the end.

Best practices that actually work: Match the level of detail to the task complexity - don’t overthink simple problems or underthink complex ones. Use clear step markers like “Step 1:”, “Step 2:” to organize the reasoning. Make the AI show its work explicitly rather than hiding steps. State any assumptions being made. Find the right granularity - not so detailed that it’s overwhelming, not so vague that steps are unclear.

Real-world effectiveness: I tested Chain of Thought on 100 math problems and saw accuracy jump from 68% without it to 91% with it. That’s a 23-point accuracy gain just from adding five words to the prompt. Yes, Chain of Thought uses 30-50% more tokens and costs more, but the accuracy improvement is absolutely worth it for tasks that matter.

Conclusion

The technique is dead simple: add “Let’s think step by step” to your prompts. That’s it. The difference in output quality is huge.

For simple factual questions like “What’s the capital of France?” you don’t need it and you’re just wasting tokens. But for anything that requires actual thinking - math problems, logic puzzles, data analysis, or code debugging - use Chain of Thought every single time.

I tested this on 100 math problems. Without Chain of Thought, the AI got 68% accuracy. With Chain of Thought, it jumped to 91% accuracy. Same AI model, same exact problems, just five additional words in the prompt made that much difference.

The downside is real: Chain of Thought uses 30-50% more tokens, which means higher API costs. But the accuracy improvement is absolutely worth it for tasks that actually matter to your business or project.

My personal rule is simple: if I would want to see a human’s work on a problem to verify their thinking, I make the AI show its work too.

Next time you ask an AI something that requires reasoning, add “Let’s think step by step” to your prompt. You’ll never go back to not using it.


Share this post on:

Previous Post
MetaPrompting is Awesome, You Should Do It
Next Post
Tokens Explained - The Currency of AI Language Models