I once asked Claude Sonnet to write a function for me and got back 50 lines of messy JavaScript that didn’t work. Then I asked differently and got perfect code in 10 lines.
Same AI, same task, different prompt, completely different result. That’s prompt engineering in a nutshell - learning how to ask AI for what you actually want. Ask vaguely and you’ll get garbage, but ask specifically and you’ll get exactly what you need.
Table of contents
Open Table of contents
What is Prompt Engineering?
Prompt engineering is just writing better questions for AI systems. Instead of saying “write me code,” you say “write a JavaScript function that takes an array of numbers, returns the median, and properly handles empty arrays and even-length arrays.” Same basic idea, but the results are dramatically better.
Why It Matters
Better prompts lead to better outputs - it’s that simple. When you improve your prompts, you get more accurate, consistent, and specific responses while saving time. Poor prompts, on the other hand, give you vague or downright incorrect responses that you have to fix manually.
Core Principles
Clarity: Be explicit about what you want. Instead of “tell me about dogs,” try “give me an overview of Golden Retrievers covering their temperament, exercise needs, common health issues, and suitability for families.”
Context: Provide background information that shapes the response. For example: “You’re a software architect reviewing e-commerce code. Analyze this database schema for scalability issues.”
Format: Specify the exact structure you need. Try: “List 5 key benefits of TypeScript. For each one, provide the benefit in one sentence, a code example, and the practical impact on development.”
Role: Assign a perspective that fits your needs. Something like: “As a senior DevOps engineer, explain container orchestration to a junior developer who’s familiar with basic Docker concepts.”
Common Techniques
Chain-of-thought: Ask the AI to show its work. For example: “Solve this step by step: If a car travels 65 mph for 2.5 hours, how far does it go?”
Numbered instructions: Give explicit steps for complex tasks. “1. Identify the main argument. 2. List supporting evidence. 3. Evaluate the logic. 4. Suggest potential counterarguments.”
Templates: Create reusable structures you can fill in. Something like: “Analyze [TOPIC] from a [ROLE] perspective. Consider [FACTORS]. Format your response as [FORMAT].”
Applications
Prompt engineering shows up everywhere in modern work. In software development, it powers code generation, debugging assistance, and documentation writing. For content creation, it helps with articles, marketing copy, and SEO optimization. Data analysts use it to extract insights, summarize statistics, and generate reports. Customer service teams apply it to draft responses, analyze sentiment, and categorize support tickets.
Common Pitfalls
Missing context: I once asked an AI to “fix the bug” without providing any code or context, and got back generic debugging advice that was completely useless. The AI doesn’t know what you’re working on unless you tell it.
Too verbose: Writing 500-word prompts just wastes tokens and confuses the AI. A focused 50-word prompt with relevant information works way better.
No format specification: I asked for “data analysis” once and got back paragraphs of prose when I needed bullets with numbers. Always specify your format - JSON, markdown, bullets, code blocks, whatever you need.
Ignoring limitations: LLMs have knowledge cutoffs, they hallucinate facts, and they’re terrible at complex math. Know what AI is good at and what it sucks at.
Not iterating: Your first prompt will rarely work perfectly. The process is: write a prompt, test it, fix what’s broken, test again, repeat until it works.
Conclusion
Prompt engineering isn’t magic - it’s just being specific about what you want. The better you describe what you need, the better the AI performs.
Here’s what usually happens: people ask vague questions, get vague answers, and blame the AI. But the AI did exactly what you asked for. You just didn’t ask right.
My approach is pretty simple: write a specific prompt, test it, fix what’s broken, and repeat until it works. Then I save the working prompts and reuse them constantly - code review prompts, writing prompts, analysis prompts, whatever I need regularly.
Your first prompts will be terrible, but practice improves them. Eventually it becomes second nature and you don’t even think about it.
The key lesson? How you ask matters as much as what you ask. Maybe more.