I built a chatbot for customer support and the first version showed a loading spinner for 8 seconds while the AI thought, and then the full answer appeared all at once. Users consistently complained that it felt slow and unresponsive.
Then I added streaming to show tokens as they generated. The AI still took the same 8 seconds to finish, but now users could see words appearing in real-time. Suddenly nobody complained about speed anymore. The actual processing time was identical, but the perceived speed changed dramatically.
Table of contents
Open Table of contents
What Is Streaming?
Regular responses make you wait for the AI to generate the entire response internally, and then display everything all at once when it’s completely finished.
Streaming responses display each token to the user as soon as the AI generates it, showing the response building word by word in real-time.
Both approaches take exactly the same amount of total processing time on the backend. But streaming shows visible progress throughout the generation process, which makes the experience feel 30-50% faster to users even when the actual speed hasn’t changed at all.
When to Use Streaming
You should definitely use streaming for:
- Long responses (500+ words) like documentation generation, full articles, or detailed explanations where seeing progress matters
- Chat interfaces where users expect real-time conversation and streaming creates that natural conversational flow
- Complex queries where streaming shows the AI is actively working, which prevents that anxious “did it fail or is it still thinking?” feeling
- Partial answers that can be consumed incrementally where users can start reading and potentially stop when they find what they need
You can safely skip streaming for:
- Short responses where one-sentence answers appear instantly anyway and streaming adds no perceptual benefit
- Structured data outputs like JSON or CSV that get parsed by code rather than read by humans, so nobody’s watching the stream
- Batch processing jobs where users aren’t actively waiting and watching, they’re doing something else entirely
- Responses that need validation before display where you can’t show partial invalid code or incorrect calculations
Implementation Complexity
Streaming is significantly more complex to implement than regular responses. You have to handle incoming data chunks correctly, update the UI incrementally without breaking layout, manage streaming state throughout the lifecycle, handle errors that occur mid-stream gracefully, and deal with users navigating away while streams are active.
This complexity is absolutely worth it for chatbots serving long-form responses where user experience matters. It’s definitely not worth the engineering overhead for a simple API that returns structured data to another service.
The key perceptual difference is time to first token: Non-streaming responses show nothing for 5000ms until everything is done. Streaming responses show the first word in just 200ms, almost immediately. That means users see visible feedback 4.8 seconds earlier, which makes the entire experience feel dramatically faster.
UI Considerations
You need to show a blinking cursor or animated indicator to signal “still generating” so users know when the response is complete. Enable auto-scroll for chat interfaces where new content should stay visible, but disable it for embedded responses where users might be reading earlier parts. Provide a stop button that lets users cancel mid-stream if they realize the answer isn’t what they want. Display a clear “Response incomplete” message if the stream cuts off unexpectedly due to errors or network issues. Show a loading indicator from the moment they submit until the first token arrives so there’s no dead time where nothing is happening.
Common Mistakes
Streaming short responses where a one-sentence answer would appear instantly anyway, which adds complexity for zero user benefit. Not handling errors properly when streams break mid-response, leaving users confused about whether the answer is complete or broken. Auto-scrolling constantly while users are trying to read earlier parts of the response, which is incredibly frustrating. Not showing a visual indicator that makes it clear the response is still generating versus being complete. Using streaming for absolutely everything just because ChatGPT does it, without considering whether it actually improves your specific use case.
Bottom Line
Streaming doesn’t actually speed up the generation process at all. What it does is dramatically improve perceived performance by showing visible progress throughout that generation time.
Use streaming for chat interfaces where conversation feels natural, long responses where progress indication matters, and interactive experiences where users are actively watching the output.
Skip streaming for short responses that appear instantly anyway, structured data that gets parsed by code rather than read by humans, and background processing where users aren’t watching.
The implementation complexity is absolutely worth it when user experience improves significantly. But if streaming doesn’t meaningfully improve the experience, just keep it simple with regular responses. You get the same functionality with less code to write and maintain, and everything becomes easier to debug when things go wrong.